<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter Pro? Forget it, Remove The Limit or Pownce will Own Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilityhacks.com/twitter-pro-forget-it-remove-the-limit-or-pownce-will-own-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilityhacks.com/twitter-pro-forget-it-remove-the-limit-or-pownce-will-own-twitter/</link>
	<description>Look Ma, No Wires!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 19:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Faco</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilityhacks.com/twitter-pro-forget-it-remove-the-limit-or-pownce-will-own-twitter/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Faco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 16:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twitterhacks.com/twitter-pro-forget-it-remove-the-limit-or-pownce-will-own-twitter/#comment-69</guid>
		<description>I concurr. Twitter does have two ways though to bypass the limit. One is copy-pasting yout message and other is sending it through gtalk unabridged. Of course it will only show fully in that particular status.

Brevity is the soul of wit and Twitter's too. Going beyond it would be missing the whole point. And noone really needs much more for what are they doing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I concurr. Twitter does have two ways though to bypass the limit. One is copy-pasting yout message and other is sending it through gtalk unabridged. Of course it will only show fully in that particular status.</p>
<p>Brevity is the soul of wit and Twitter&#8217;s too. Going beyond it would be missing the whole point. And noone really needs much more for what are they doing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
